蒙古论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1411|回复: 23

阿勒泰山五万年前人骨DNA分析

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-12-23 04:27:47 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
阿勒泰山五万年前人骨DNA分析的结果,认为有一个在尼人和克人之外的另一种人。
这种人的遗传因素,在今天的人类中只有巴布亚人有些混杂。



http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/0,1518,736227,00.html
发表于 2010-12-23 11:52:01 | 显示全部楼层
巴布亚人穿越了?
发表于 2010-12-23 12:59:12 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 Yungsiyebu 于 2010-12-23 13:01 编辑
阿勒泰山五万年前人骨DNA分析的结果,认为有一个在尼人和克人之外的另一种人。
这种人的遗传因素,在今天的人类中只有巴布亚人有些混杂。



http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/0,1518,736227,00.html
rasuludin 发表于 2010-12-23 04:27


之前介绍过著名的X lady,4.2万年前,之前一直怀疑这些石叶工业人群是北方人群的远祖,但事实上,是一个离现代人群比尼安德特人还远的多的亚洲原著种系。

不知道这个是否是新的?有点忙,回头了解。
发表于 2010-12-23 15:24:05 | 显示全部楼层
什么意思?亚洲尼人没灭绝吗?这可是重大发现啊
发表于 2010-12-24 17:53:43 | 显示全部楼层
David Reich et al(2010) Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.

这是文献原文,还没搞到原文,哪位达人看看能不能荡下来。

看完以后服了,远远超出本人的想象力,太复杂了,年初测得西伯利亚X women,我记得是和现代人群是分离100万年(从母系遗传上看),比尼安德特人离现代人群还要远,而我们之前寄希望于这批4-4.5万年前的石叶工业人群是北方人群的祖先呢,因为这个年代已经是按一般推测出非洲人群完成对欧亚大陆占领的年代了,现在看来,远远不是。

这份更夸张,又证明是一个相对离尼安德特人更近的种系,但注意不是尼安德特人,之前南西伯利亚测过莫斯特石器人骨,那才是与欧洲一样的典型尼安德特人。

X women测完之后,我还估计,虽然母系遗传无影响,但可能常染色体有影响,然而果真有影响,但不是对法国和中国的样本,竟然是对遥远的美拉尼西亚人有4-6%的血统共享,太神奇了,可惜蒙古的样本没有进行比对。
发表于 2010-12-24 17:56:30 | 显示全部楼层
之前关于x women文献后的读后感,现在看来远远超出我的想象力,一时无读后感可写。 X女士与南西伯利亚的石叶工业


http://hi.baidu.com/%CD%E4%D4%C2 ... c45994a8018ee0.html
发表于 2010-12-24 18:39:17 | 显示全部楼层
你们通俗点交流行不?
让大家都基本能懂行不?
发表于 2010-12-24 18:54:54 | 显示全部楼层
这样说,南西伯利亚在4-5万年前存在两类石器工业:

一类莫斯特文化,与欧洲尼安德特人的石器类型一样,前几年测过母系遗传的mtdna,结果表明他们的确是尼安德特人,说明尼人曾经从欧洲迁徙到了中亚和西伯利亚的交接地域,是否更东迁徙到远东,很可能,尽管还未发现典型的尼安德特人骨,鄂尔多斯人骨、外蒙古一例人骨都表现出一些与尼人类似的特征。且,今年最新的常染色体分析显示,尼安德特人的母系遗传标记虽然没有继承下来,但其常染色体可能对现代人群有血统影响,当时考察的法国和中国样本都有低于5%的尼安德特人共享因素,而非洲人群缺失,暗示尼安德特人对现代欧亚人群有血统共享。

另一类就是南西伯利亚的石叶工业,大约最早4.5万年前,类似的石叶工业与欧洲、黎凡特的类似,曾经一度被认为是出非洲人群早在4.5万年前进入尼安德特人莫斯特文化圈的证据,且认为欧洲的几何形石器或西伯利亚的细石叶细石器都是由石叶工业演化而来的。但年初4.1万年前同一个南西伯利亚采样地点的x mowan人骨dna显示其母系遗传距离比现代人同尼安德特人还要远的多,分离了100万年。现代人群是否继承了一些X woman的常染色体血统不好说,因为还没测,我是超级希望,我们能有一些这些石叶工业猎人的血统。

这份研究同样采自这个南西伯利亚考古点,但年代要高于5万年,令人吃惊的是他与尼安德特人更近一些,且常染色体遗传对法国和中国样本无影响,反而对遥远的美拉尼西亚人有4.8%的血统共享。
发表于 2010-12-24 19:02:12 | 显示全部楼层
关于母系遗传的线粒体DNA(mtdna)和常染色体遗传,解释一下。

mtdna只由母亲遗传给子女,也就是说只有通过女儿才能时代遗传下去。具体说,如果你是女孩,你继承的是妈妈的mtdna,也就是姥姥的mtdna,但你奶奶的mtdna在你身上不存在了。如果你是男孩,你虽然也继承了你妈妈和姥姥的mtdna,但你的mtdna将不可能遗传给你的子女。

常染色体遗传不同,虽然你不可能继承你奶奶的mtdna,但却可以继承其1/4的常染色体成分。这样,对于尼安德特人对现代欧亚人群(法国和中国样本为例)的低于5%的遗传共享,可能存在几种可能,一种是刚出非洲在西亚一带混合的,且尼安德特人可能就是这里的老奶奶,她的mtdna没有遗传给现代人群,但常染色体却有共享。美拉尼西亚的西伯利亚5万年古人类的4.8%混合也是同样的道理。
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-24 21:20:24 | 显示全部楼层
维基文章:

Denisova hominin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Woman X" redirects here. For other uses, see X woman.
The Denisova hominin /dɨˈnɪsəvə/ is the name given to the remains of a member of the genus Homo that may be a previously unknown species based on an analysis of its mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). In March 2010, discovery was announced of bone fragments of a juvenile that lived about 41,000 years ago found in Denisova Cave (Altai Krai, Russia)—a region also inhabited at about the same time by Neanderthals and modern humans.[1][2] The mtDNA of the Denisova hominin is distinct from the mtDNAs of Neanderthals and modern humans.[3] In December 2010, an international team of scientists determined the sequence from the nuclear genome of this group (known as the Denisovans) from this finger bone. Based on their analysis, this group was related to the Neanderthals and interbred with the ancestors of modern Melanesians.[4]

Contents [hide]
1 Anatomy and lineage
2 Discovery
3 Nuclear genome analysis
4 Interbreeding with modern humans
5 See also
6 References
7 Further reading
8 External links


[edit] Anatomy and lineage
Little is known of the anatomical features of the individual in question since the only physical remains discovered thus far are the finger bone from which only mitochondrial genetic material was gathered. The Siberian bone's mtDNA differs from that of modern humans by 385 bases (nucleotides) in the mtDNA strand out of approximately 16,500, whereas the difference between modern humans and Neanderthals is around 202 bases. In contrast, the difference between chimpanzees and modern humans is approximately 1,462 mtDNA base pairs. Analysis of the specimen's nuclear DNA shows it to be a branch of the Neanderthal lineage.[4][1][5] Even though the Denisova hominin's mtDNA lineage predates the divergence of modern humans and Neanderthals, coalescent theory does not preclude a more recent divergence date for her nuclear DNA.

[edit] Discovery
In 2008, Russian archeologists working at the site of Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains of Siberia uncovered a small bone fragment from the fifth finger of a juvenile hominin, dubbed the "X-woman" (referring to the maternal descent of mitochondrial DNA[5]), or the Denisova hominin. Artifacts, including a bracelet, excavated in the cave at the same level were carbon dated to around 40,000 BP.

A team of scientists led by Johannes Krause and Swedish biologist Svante Pääbo from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany sequenced mtDNA extracted from the fragment. Because of the cool climate in the location of the Denisova Cave, the discovery benefited from DNA's ability to survive for longer periods at lower temperatures.[2] The analysis indicated that modern humans, Neanderthals, and the Denisova hominin last shared a common ancestor around 1 million years ago.[3] Modern humans are known to have overlapped with Neanderthals in Europe for more than 10,000 years, and the discovery raises the possibility that Neanderthals, modern humans and the Denisovan hominin may have co-existed.

The DNA analysis further indicated that this new hominin species was the result of an early migration out of Africa, distinct from the later out-of-Africa migrations associated with Neanderthals and modern humans, but also distinct from the earlier African exodus of Homo erectus.[3] Professor Chris Stringer, human origins researcher at London's Natural History Museum and one of the leading proponents of the recent single-origin hypothesis, remarked: "This new DNA work provides an entirely new way of looking at the still poorly understood evolution of humans in central and eastern Asia." Pääbo noted that the existence of this distant branch creates a much more complex picture of humankind during the Late Pleistocene.[5]

In 2010, a second paper from the Svante Pääbo group reported the prior discovery, in 2000, of a 3rd upper molar from a young adult, dating from about the same time (the finger was from level 11 in the cave sequence, the tooth from level 11.1). The tooth differed in several aspects from those of Neanderthal, while having archaic characteristics similar to the teeth of Homo erectus. They again performed mitochondrial DNA analysis on the tooth and found it to have a different but similar sequence to that from the bone, indicating a divergence time about 7500 years before, and suggesting it belonged to a different individual from the same population.[6]

[edit] Nuclear genome analysis
In the same 2010 paper, the authors report the isolation and sequencing of nuclear DNA from the Denisova finger bone. This specimen showed an unusual degree of DNA preservation and low level of contamination. They were able to achieve near-complete genomic sequencing, allowing a detailed comparison with Neanderthal and modern humans. From this analysis, they concluded that in spite of the apparent divergence of their mitochondrial sequence, the Denisova population along with Neanderthal shared a common branch from the lineage leading to modern African humans. The estimated time of divergence between Denisovans and Neanderthals is 640,000 years ago, and that between both these groups and modern Africans is 804,000 years ago. They suggest that the divergence of the Denisova mtDNA results either from the persistence of a lineage purged from the other branches of humanity through genetic drift or else an introgression from an older hominin lineage.[6]

[edit] Interbreeding with modern humans
In addition to genetic studies linking approximately 4% of non-African modern human DNA to Neanderthals, these tests comparing the Denisova hominin genome with those of modern humans from Africa, Europe, East Asia and Melanesia showed that between 4% and 6% of the genome of Melanesians derives from a Denisovan population, possibly introduced during the early migration of the ancestors of Melanesians into Southeast Asia. This history of interaction suggests that Denisovans once ranged widely over eastern Asia.[6]

[edit] See also
Archaic Homo sapiens
Homo floresiensis
Homo gautengensis, another human species identified in 2010
Human evolution
List of human evolution fossils
Recent African origin of modern humans
[edit] References
^ a b Brown, David (March 25, 2010), "DNA from bone shows new human forerunner, and raises array of questions", Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp ... 10032401926_pf.html  
^ a b Krause, Johannes; Fu, Qiaomei; Good, Jeffrey M.; Viola, Bence; Shunkov, Michael V.; Derevianko, Anatoli P. & Pääbo, Svante (2010), "The complete mitochondrial DNA genome of an unknown hominin from southern Siberia", Nature 464 (7290): 894–897, doi:10.1038/nature08976, PMID 20336068  
^ a b c Katsnelson, Alla (March 24, 2010), "New hominin found via mtDNA", The Scientist, http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57254/#ixzz0j820ioz1  
^ a b Carl Zimmer (22 December 2010). "Denisovans Were Neanderthals' Cousins, DNA Analysis Reveals". NYTimes.com. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/23/science/23ancestor.html?hp. Retrieved 22 December 2010.  
^ a b c Sample, Ian (March 24, 2010), "New species of human ancestor found in Siberia", The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/scienc ... man-species-siberia  
^ a b c Reich, David; Green, Richard E.; Kircher, Martin; Krause, Johannes; Patterson, Nick; Durand, Eric Y.; Viola, Bence; Briggs, Adrian W. et al. (2010), "Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia", Nature 468 (7327): 1053-1060, doi:10.1038/nature09710
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|蒙古论坛

GMT+8, 2026-7-15 13:03 , Processed in 0.013403 second(s), 15 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表